CMS wellbeing ambassador quits firm over anti-Islam and trans social media posts

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

11

Reform UK candidate exposed for offensive posts by political X account


City law firm CMS says it has taken “prompt and decisive action” against one of its wellbeing ambassadors after a political account on X exposed several of his anti-Islam and anti-trans social media posts.

In a since deleted tweet, Dan Cooper, an HR business partner and wellbeing ambassador at CMS, told his followers last month: “I hate Islam. It’s a 7th century barbaric cult. I don’t fear it, I loath it.”

In furthers posts, also since deleted, Cooper said, “If you are over 18 and think you are transgender then you have a mental illness” and suggested people who destroyed Pride flags “should be applauded and given a free Happy Meal.”

Legal Cheek understands Cooper has now left the firm.

Cooper has since deactivated his account on X. However, before doing so, his posts were screenshotted and shared by the account ‘Reform Party UK Exposed’. Some of the posts are also available on webpage capture service archive.today.

This account appears to have targeted Cooper after he announced earlier this month that he would be standing for Reform UK in the Boston Coastal division of Lincolnshire County Council this May. It remains unclear whether he is still a candidate. Reform UK has been approached for comment.

Cooper’s LinkedIn profile — which has been deleted overnight — described him as an “International Senior HR Business Partner” at CMS, followed by the disclaimer, “All views expressed are my own”. He was also listed as a filmmaker and author of children’s books. He also referred to himself as a “wellbeing ambassador,” though this seems to have been removed before his account was deleted, yet it still appears in a Google search.

A CMS spokesperson told Legal Cheek:

We took prompt and decisive action as soon as we learnt about the nature of the individual’s offensive remarks on social media. The views expressed on their personal social media accounts are their own and do not represent those of the firm. At CMS we are committed to creating an inclusive environment for all our colleagues and we will be supporting all the individuals affected by this.

Cooper didn’t respond to our requests for comment.

The 2025 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

11 Comments

Anon

Well, even if I disagree with his views, he is entitled to them and silencing him or firing him for them is both authoritarian and in contravention of his Art. 10 right. It seems to me that they perhaps aren’t after inclusivity as much as everyone falling in line with their ideological views – arguably that’s worse than what the man is question said to begin with.

Larch

You sound about as arrogant and stupid as him. No wonder you’re posting anonymously.

Anon

Is that on the basis of something being substantively wrong with my comment, or just because you happen to not like what I’ve said? Do you care to actually advance a view beyond personal attacks? If not, quelle surprise. You’re doing exactly the same as CMS. As “Who’s Larch?” points out, if nothing else, it’s massively hypocritical. They have offices in countries where this person’s views are the norm. What are they to do? Fire everyone from those offices too, in order to apply the same standards to everyone? Or only cower to “outrage” (which probably means a few left wing people at most) in those countries which are most sensitive? They’ve done the one thing that shows how weak and ideologically driven they are.

Dean

I think you’ve missed the point here.

Whilst everyone has a right to an opinion, the way and manner in which you voice it matters. Especially at a law firm. CMS is entitled to have a social media policy and enforce it. If you publicly voice an opinion that is offensive towards and is actively against certain large groups of people, then that will of course be in breach of that policy.

The fact that a firm has offices in other jurisdictions where social views/norms might well be different to those we have in the UK is a separate matter and moral question that ought not to be muddled in with the position reached around Mr Cooper. However, I think your assumption ‘were this person’s views are the norm’ is quite presumptuous and possibly incorrect. In any event, the social media policy will apply to those individuals and I’d be surprised if you found anybody from those offices making such callous remarks on social media.

You jumped to conclusions

Please point me to exactly where in this article it states that CMS silenced him or fired him. CMS does not have the power to delete an individual’s social media accounts so Dan likely deleted his own social media accounts so he chose to silence himself. CMS only stated they took prompt and decisive action – this does not necessarily mean firing.

Bendix

Yes he’s entitled to his views, as is everyone. He is even entitled to express his views. However, as a senior HR professional responsible for promoting an inclusive working environment – something likely in his job description – forcibly expressing those views clearly mean he is incapable of performing that job.

If he is know to hate Islam, how can Muslim members trust anyone in HR to deal with their issues? How can they feel they are not being held back because the HR guy assigned to them despises everything about them?

Learn to think things through a bit.

The Observer

CMS always in the press for all the wrong reasons!

Who's Larch?

Can we please get the view on trans people from the head of CMS’ Ryad office? Also happy with Oman, or UAE.

Truth

Exactly. Its all lip service.

Real Truth

Law firms should not have to waste resources by having any views on such matters.

John Bull

Now that the PRA and FCA are dumping mandated DEI nonsense, hopefully the legal regulators will follow suit quickly so that the tawdry mini-industry of DEI social engineering can come to a swift and well-deserved end.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Controversial barrister suspended for two years over ‘obscene’ tweets

Barbara Hewson banned from practice over foul-mouthed social media posts

Dec 19 2019 12:32pm

Legal Twitterati outrage over Home Office’s ‘activist lawyer’ tweet

The Secret Barrister changed their handle to 'The Secret Activist Lawyer (AKA Barrister)' in response

Aug 27 2020 10:38am

Bar regulator warns barristers to ‘think carefully’ about social media usage

Blog post follows BSB's battle with Charlotte Proudman

Feb 11 2025 8:46am
5