Orrick boosts NQ lawyer pay to £160k in London

Avatar photo

By Sophie Dillon on

10

14% uplift

£50 notes
Orrick has boosted the salaries of its newly qualified (NQ) lawyers in London to £160,000.

This marks a £20,000 increase from the previous rate of £140,000, representing a 14.3% raise.

Trainee pay remains unchanged, with first-years continuing to earn £55,000, rising to £60,000 in their second year.

 The 2025 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

Orrick has strengthened its position among the highest-paying law firms in the City with this latest move. The increase puts it ahead of the entire Magic Circle, where NQs currently earn £150,000 following the 2024 pay war. The US firm now matches Jones Day at £160,000 and sits just behind Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, which offers £164,500.

Mark Beeley, Orrick’s London office leader, commented:

“We are committed to ensuring our top, hard-working talent have a compensation package at the level of the firms with which we compete in the talent market – and to complement that with opportunities to counsel some of the most innovative clients. This move is part of that package.”

The Legal Cheek Firms Most List 2025 shows Orrick recruits around 12 trainees each year in London.

10 Comments

Charlie

Can someone aware me why US firms in London pay more than Magic Circle? Is it because they don’t do the less profitable work like employment etc

I’m talking not talking about your Lathams, your Kirklands, your Weils btw, I mean your Orricks, your McDermotts etc

Golden goose

I expect you mean “how” rather than “why”. They can pay more than magic circle firms because they are more profitable. They charge out at a higher rate. They are also leaner as you alluded to, which feeds into how much they can charge and the general waste of supporting teams that are not accretive. Both of the firms you mention have higher PEPs than the magic circle (McDermott’s being significantly more).

The “why” is to attract and retain talent. Juniors are put off by the idea of working at an American firm that doesn’t pay full Cravath because they think they will get the US lifestyle without the full whack, whereas the magic circle can rely on the complete and utter rubbish idea that they offer culture or worklife balance. The US firms also all pay the exact same in the US, so if you’re at the London office of those US firms, you will also want to get paid the same.

US lawyer

A number of the firms you mention do have employment and similar support practices. They just do so in a much more profitable way (ie highly contentious / complex matters or support on corp or finance deals, working to very tight deadlines etc)

Joe Bloggs

Because of market pressure and to keep up with the Joneses.

If you have a look at what the likes of Orrick / Mcdermott make (available for some US firms on Companies House), you will quickly realise they are being subsided by the US operations given they are not making the big money of the elite US firms.

Truth Anti-social

Because the MC has a social cachet that means the US firms have to pay more in order to tempt equivalent talent.

realist

Regrettably true, for the same reason Goldman can pay less than other banks. No one doubts a trainee/junior coming from an MC firm has had a reasonable legal education. US firms? Who knows, for now at least.

Joan

Double the pay of a Cambridge law professor with 30 plus years work experience and author of the books the firms use. Joke really.

Kai

Yes. Because society values junior lawyers helping to facilitate deals more highly than it values some boomer professor.

not that simple

Law professor can become a door tenant in a London chambers and presumably have some extra earnings on the side (c.f. Dixon, Virgo)

Abbreviations are that simple

Incorrect usage of cf. Please fix.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Man and pound signs

Regional junior lawyer salaries reach record high

The Legal Cheek team discuss Simmons' new and improved £96k NQ pay in Bristol -- listen now 🎙️

Jan 21 2025 8:49am