Junior lawyers will be ‘significantly replaced’ by technologists and data scientists, Paul Weiss boss predicts

Avatar photo

By Rhys Duncan on

3

Top lawyer foresees shifting roles in new tech-driven legal world


The chair of US law firm Paul Weiss predicts that junior associates will be “supplemented, if not significantly replaced”, by technologists and data scientists in the years to come.

Brad Karp made the eye-catching comment whilst speaking about the firms bumper financial results, which have seen revenue jump by 31.6% to $2.63 billion (£2.09 billion), with its average profits per equity partner increasing by 14.7% to $7.51 million (£5.95 million).

Karp told website Law.com (£) that this growth has been driven by the firm investing “hundreds of millions” across the board, he said, including into artificial intelligence (AI). This includes partners, technologists and other staff members focussed on adapting, testing, and deploying AI tech.

 The 2025 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

“We are currently using cutting-edge AI tools, in close collaboration with our clients, to facilitate document analysis and extraction, synthesise complex documents and agreements, automate legal and non-legal drafting, enhance legal research and increase work-flow efficiency,” Karp said. “This new tech will impact the firm’s hiring, billable hours, leverage, and client service and spend.”

Karp then made a bold prediction about the future of lawyer roles in a tech-driven legal world.

“Over time, I believe we will see junior associates supplemented, if not significantly replaced, by technologists and data scientists for a broad portfolio of projects. We will see more and more work come to be characterised as commoditised and increasingly be handled by AI technologists and data scientists, under the supervision of lawyers”

3 Comments

Computer says no, and I agree

The headline sounds insane, but the full quote is more reasonable. Lawyers will become the box tickers we wish we were: AI takes an input and runs its formulae, produces an output and some qualified individual will sign off on it.

If clients think we are billing any less though, they have another thing coming.

Paper monkey

Assuming the clients aren’t intelligent enough to tick boxes themselves / bypass the middle men called “lawyers”

Finally the truth

All AI needs now is some fine-tuning before being able to replace the vast majority of paper pushers. Humanities and law students are nowhere as smart or intelligent as the average programmer to put it kindly.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Linklaters gives AI exam on English law

Results on the up, but human supervision still required

Feb 17 2025 9:15am
3