Hogan Lovells and Addleshaw Goddard post spring trainee retention rates 

Avatar photo

By Sophie Dillon on

7

78% and 100%

City of London at sunset
Hogan Lovells and Addleshaw Goddard have posted retention figures for their spring 2025 qualifying trainees, coming in at 78% and 100% respectively.

Hogan Lovells’ figure comprises 18 out of 23 of its final-seat trainees, with 20 applying for newly qualified (NQ) positions and 19 offers made — including three on fixed-term contracts (FTCs). All 18 offers were accepted, with the three FTCs accounting for 17% of the retained cohort.

The practice area breakdown reveals that nearly half of the NQs are heading into corporate (44%), with finance (22%), litigation, arbitration and employment (28%), and global regulatory (6%) also represented. No trainees were retained in intellectual property, media and technology (IPMT).

This marks a notable increase from Hogan Lovells’ previous retention rate of 65% in autumn 2024, when 17 of 26 trainees took up NQ positions on permanent contracts.

 The 2025 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

Meanwhile, Addleshaw Goddard has achieved a perfect score, retaining all 11 of its spring qualifiers. The cohort is split across corporate and commercial (four), disputes (two), real estate (two), and finance and projects (one), with the final two trainees heading to Dubai.

The newly-qualifieds staying in the UK will be based in London (five), Leeds (three) and Manchester (one).

New associates at the firm will now be able to enjoy NQ pay of £100,000 — recently increased by 5%. The Legal Cheek Firms List shows that the firm takes on 60 trainees each year.

These latest retention scores come shortly after Magic Circle firm Linklaters posted its spring retention rate of 75%. Herbert Smith Freehills and A&O Shearman were quick to follow with retention rates of 88% and 84% respectively.

7 Comments

Disgruntled second seat

At least theyre not afraid to publish their result’s

Ayy

Data can be manipulated

Benjamin Disraeli

There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.

Pollen and Avery

Fourth is retention stats.

Ronald Coase

The problem of transaction costs endures (supply vs. demand—externalities); with the key determinants being i) uncertainty and ii) opportunistic behaviour.
The high retention rates still do not mirror Pareto-efficient use/allocation of resouces (human).
SRA and BSB need to be subjected to “economic analyses of regulation”.
A game-theoretic model can used as well, for practical reforms.

James Meade

If “reciprocal externalities” are anything to go by, then even the BSB and SRA cannot significantly increase job-market efficiency and allocation of resources. Coasean bargaining might be of little help.

Monitoring of externalities is hard and mitigation costly to enforce. The prized noble profession that is Law; the legal services job-market will respond to changes eventually, which can only be predicted by “empirical modelling” and “economic analyses”.

Numbercruncher

Contrary to the article’s claim of a substantial retention increase, HogLove has 3 trainees on FTCs so there is no real improvement on their Autumn 2024 results -15 out of 23 retained on permanent contracts is only 65%, a relatively low retention rate and no increase at all

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Linklaters retains 75% of trainees globally

Several rookies heading to different offices around the world

Feb 6 2025 10:10am
2