SRA reopens investigation into Business Secretary’s ‘solicitor’ claim

Avatar photo

By Sophie Dillon on

8

Regulator aware of ‘further information’

Jonathan Reynolds MP
Jonathan Reynolds MP

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has reopened an investigation into Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds after reports surfaced that he described himself as a “solicitor” despite never qualifying.

Reynolds, who is the MP for Stalybridge and Hyde, trained at Addleshaw Goddard in Manchester for all of ten months before he left the role to pursue a career in politics. Under the Solicitors Act 1974, the term “solicitor” is legally protected and can only be used by those admitted to the roll of solicitors.

The issue first came to light after political blog Guido Fawkes shared screenshots showing Reynolds’ LinkedIn profile referring to him as a solicitor. While the references have since been removed, Reynolds has also been noted to have referred to himself as a solicitor in parliamentary debates.

Last week, the regulator announced it would take no further action against the MP. However, in a fresh update on Friday, it confirmed that the investigation has been reopened.

A spokesperson for the SRA said:

“We looked at that issue at the time we became aware of it and contacted Mr Reynolds about the profiles. The materials were corrected, and we closed the matter with no further action based on all the evidence we had at the time. However, we’ve now become aware of further information, so we will look at this.”

Previously, Reynolds’ spokesperson attributed the references to a mistake, stating that he has always sought to clarify that he was a trainee solicitor before entering politics.

The reopening of the investigation comes amid increasing scrutiny over the accuracy of CVs among politicians. Chancellor Rachel Reeves recently faced criticism over her online biography, which was edited to clarify her role at Halifax Bank of Scotland as being in retail banking rather than as an economist.

8 Comments

dms

Its very simple, being a qualified solicitor is such an achievement, you dont make a mistake, you know, either you are or you are not.

Cowboy

Absolutely dms. Telling fibs about your qualifications is both an insult to those of us who have earned them but also to any voters who may have been fraudulently conned into voting for you . That is a crime . Keir will go ballistic over this – watch this space .

7 years' PQE

I had a chat about this with someone recently who was adamant that he didn’t breach any laws as he didn’t gain anything from using the protected title, such as getting the MP job. See; s.21 Solicitors Act:

“Any unqualified person who wilfully pretends to be, or takes or uses any name, title, addition or description implying that he is, qualified or recognised by law as qualified to act as a solicitor shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction…”

Pretty clear, isn’t it?

Concerned

If the re-opened investigation focuses on statements made in the House of Commons, does the SRA have any jurisdiction to censure given parliamentary privilege?

Anonymous

I don’t think it will, although it depends on the context (I haven’t seen his statements in the Commons). But I understand PP does not extend to instances where an MP misleads facts, but rather it protects against statements or conduct that have a basis in fact but not in decorum/general public interest, or statements that reflect a view of a specific cohort that is relevant to a debate in the House. I can’t see how parliamentary privilege could apply when his statement was simply false rather than him exercising freedom of speech.

Jon "Bones" Jones

It was reported that the SRA decided not to take any action as he was considered senior. However, upon further investigation, the SRA concluded that his latest position was a 10-month trainee solicitor, thus a junior lawyer and therefore decided that the book should be thrown at him.

Fake Solicitor

If he put that he was a solicitor on a y election materials and as a result gai ex a single vote he’d be in breach of s21 of the Solicitors Act.

Fake Voter

Given the public’s view of solicitors, I would have thought the misleading CV reference could only have lost him votes.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Starmer selects new Lord Chancellor and Attorney General

Barristers Shabana Mahmood MP and Richard Hermer KC

Jul 8 2024 11:46am

Autumn budget: Further cuts to justice ‘untenable’, Law Society warns

The Chancery Lane body says MoJ needs essential funding to address courts backlog

Oct 29 2024 8:38am