Google-backed AI platform buys law firm in UK legal industry first

Avatar photo

By Julia Szaniszlo on

7

Lawhive acquires conveyance specialist


An AI powered lawtech company backed by Google has acquired a UK law firm, in what is thought to be a first for the country’s legal industry.

The deal, confirmed yesterday, sees Lawhive — which raised nearly £40 million in funding last year — take over Woodstock Legal Services. The acquisition marks Lawhive’s entry into the regulated legal sector, with the aim of combining lawyers’ expertise with in-house AI tools.

Founded in 2014, Woodstock operates a consultancy model and specialises in property law and conveyancing.

Lawhive’s AI assistant, “Lawrence”, is designed to handle tasks typically carried out by paralegals or junior lawyers, including drafting documents, conducting research and managing cases.

Legal Cheek reported in 2023 that Lawrence passed the SQE with a score of 74%. Since then, Google Ventures, the venture capital arm of Google’s parent company Alphabet, has invested £9.5 million in the firm.

The 2026 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

The acquisition will see the technology rolled out in areas such as conveyancing, where time-consuming paperwork often slows down transactions.

Lawhive currently operates across 12 consumer law practice areas including family, civil litigation and property. It says its AI allows lawyers to spend less time on admin and more time advising clients.

CEO and co-founder Pierre Proner said: “We believe that Lawhive’s vertically integrated model of a regulated law firm and tech platform for lawyers to work alongside AI colleagues, creates better outcomes for everyone.”

Woodstock founder Carly Jermyn added: “This partnership is about scaling our vision with the right kind of technology — AI that enhances our skills and values, rather than eroding them.”

According to Lawhive, its acquisition of Woodstock “forms part of a broader trend where lawyers are rethinking their relationship with work, clients are demanding better service, and AI is becoming an integral part of legal practice.”

7 Comments

JD

So that ‘should’ translate to lower charges… if not then use human beings and save jobs long term !

D

Greater profits will be the result

Michael Baybutt

So, if the AI is doing the work that junior lawyers do, where will the senior lawyers of the future come from? Surely someone will have to be trained?

Anonymous

Anything that is a tech firm before it’s a law firm is suspicious. It’s not about saving jobs. It’s about negligence. Lawyers will be blamed for all the errors and misuse of technology, whereas tech firms will profit from legal work that can only be done with human judgement. Anyone who can read can know the law, but application the human relationship is integral to good legal services. If the human element is replaced by machines, no professional duty of care should be owed to the machine users.

Anonymous

Have they spoken to Dentons and learned their mistakes? My first instinct is that they could have overpaid otherwise. On the other hand, many can aspire to sell high. Conveyancing is a task that can (and should) be automated from the consumer’s point of view.

AI has not made software programmers work faster so far. In comparison, lawyering requires far more than simple computer logics that make outcomes in computers. Just saying. I guess many have just seen the money in law and forget it would be the tail wagging the dog if lawyers are not in charge of many things. But, if they can make consumer legal services cheaper, best of luck playing.

What we in Britain need to safeguard is uncontaminated good data will continue to be made available for the legal profession and the rule of law.

Rooh

Really disgusting and shameless to be honest. Look at big tech and a.i deeply and it’s obvious the whole thing is rotten to the core. Lawyers should be defending the institution against these profiteering predators, who are literally destroying society in favour of their own social engineering, that is opague, unregulated, and demonstrably bad for society. When these are your lawyers, no wonder we live in an unjust and inequal society.

Regional observer

How would this be unregulated?

Any provision of legal services, albeit from a tech company using AI, would still be regulated by the SRA.

If a tech company wants to churn out AI backed docs or research and rely on it, it’s between them and their indemnity insurer.

Clients will still be able to sue the tech firm if the AI output is rubbish (which, while AI is still in its infancy, it usually is).

Join the conversation

Related Stories

news SQE Hub

‘AI paralegal’ passes SQE

77% score

Nov 24 2023 7:48am
13
artificial intelligence

Government embraces AI in bid to speed up justice

New plan aims to transform courts system with AI-powered tools, reduce backlogs and boost efficiency

Aug 5 2025 8:42am
2