UK sentencing shake-up slammed by US TV star Judge Judy

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

8

Unforeseen critic

Judge Judy

US courtroom star Judge Judy has waded into Britain’s row over controversial new sentencing guidelines — branding the changes “a mistake” and declaring the justice system “broken”.

Appearing on Good Morning Britain last week, the famously no-nonsense TV judge, who previously served as a Manhattan family court judge, was asked about new guidance for English and Welsh courts that advises judges to consider an offender’s ethnicity before deciding whether to send them to prison.

The guidelines, issued by the independent Sentencing Council and set to come into force in April, place greater emphasis on pre-sentence reports for certain groups, including people from ethnic minority or faith backgrounds. These reports are designed to offer judges more information about an offender’s background, potentially influencing sentencing decisions.

But Judge Judy—real name Judy Sheindlin, a US-qualified lawyer—wasn’t having it. In an interview on the ITV breakfast show, she said: “It’s a mistake. Sometimes well intentions people create bad law. I don’t know how those criteria you mentioned have anything to do with rehabilitation — I would be furious if I didn’t fit one of those criteria.”

She went on to say the current justice system is “broken”, and that making it “look more compassionate”, won’t solve the problem.

The 2025 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

Her comments come as the UK government scrambles to respond to mounting criticism from the opposition benches. Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick has branded the guidance a “two-tier system” and is calling for the law to be changed so ministers can overrule the Sentencing Council.

Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood has publicly distanced herself from the guidance. “There will never be a two-tier sentencing approach under my watch,” Mahmood insisted, promising to write to the council to express her “displeasure”.

Meanwhile, the Sentencing Council has defended its approach, arguing it helps judges understand and address the disadvantages certain groups face in the justice system. Statistics show that offenders from ethnic minority backgrounds consistently receive longer custodial sentences than white offenders for similar crimes.

Still, critics argue the changes could undermine the principle of equal treatment before the law — and Judge Judy appears to agree.

 The 2025 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

8 Comments

Anonymous

It’s called positive discrimination, enforcing a double standard in which a person of a certain skin colour can receive a lesser sentence for the same crime as another person who is not the same skin colour. This is just worsening the system and adding a mountain of problems to things which require reform.

Ian

I’m confused. Shabana Mahmood has ‘distanced herself from the guidance’, and has made her displeasure clear, yet, she states that she will never allow a two-tier system on her watch.

It looks like that’s exactly what she’s going to do.

l

Our law is not only two tier it’s racist

Sandra

The bottom line is,this. You do the crime you pay the price. Your history doesn’t change the choices you make. A robber is a robber and their consequences has nothing to do with their background. We’re all accountable for our actions. Your history doesn’t change the act you chose to take.

Connie

I agree with Sandra 100%!

Archibald O'Pomposity

Then why didn’t you reply to her comment directly?

Archibald O'Pomposity

Judge Judy is correct. But she’s also a leathery, dessicated, bitter, increasingly wrinkled old harridan. How one reconciles these two points is a matter for the reader.

Pompers Stompers

Now that’s not very nice, is it?

I’m sure your mother would be ashamed if she knew you had made such a comment!

Now, to the matter at hand…

As for Judge Judy, compared to the Criminal Justice System in most US states, we’re still running a gold-standard system in England and Wales.

It might not be perfect here, but it’s probably a better system than you will find anywhere in the world.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Trump’s executive orders under siege — but is he already winning?

As legal challenges mount, US President escalates his attack on law firms

Mar 12 2025 8:32am

Trump targets vac schemes with new executive order 

US President attacks BigLaw diversity initiatives as 'discriminatory'

Mar 10 2025 9:04am
11

Should the Supreme Court hear more criminal appeals? The Law Commission thinks so

Part of a wider set of proposals by an independent body

Feb 28 2025 9:51am
2