Judicial watchdog issues formal warning to magistrate for suggesting he would punish youth offenders by cutting off parts of their anatomy

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

5

Ill-judged joke

Courtroom door
A magistrate has received a formal warning after the judicial watchdog said he suggested dealing with young offenders by, in its words, “cutting off parts of their anatomy”.

Although Mr Michael Berry JP did not use those exact words, he was alleged to have made a similar “offensive” remark to colleagues in the retiring room, according to the published decision.

Later that same day, it was further alleged that he directed a “sexist and offensive comment” at a female colleague, telling her not to trouble her “pretty little head…”.

Berry admitted making the comments about youth offenders, which were in line with what was alleged, but insisted they were meant as a joke and did not reflect his true views. He also did not consider the remarks to be derogatory to court users.

Regarding the comment directed at his female colleague, Berry said he did not recall making it but accepted it was possible. He also expressed concern about the complaint, suggesting his colleague may have misunderstood his sense of humour.

Berry was initially given the more serious sanction of a reprimand, after a nominated committee member found that he had made inappropriate comments that were offensive and derogatory. In doing so, he was found to have “failed to act with circumspection” and to have “failed to treat the subjects of the comments with dignity and respect”.

In reaching that decision, the committee member accepted that while Berry had not intended any malice, he should have known that his comments were “inappropriate, offensive and reckless”. It also raised corners that Berry had not taken any responsibility for his actions and did not understand the seriousness of his comments.

While a senior judge and the Lord Chancellor agreed with the committee member’s findings, they decided that the lesser sanction of a formal warning was more appropriate, citing Berry’s “long unblemished conduct record”.

5 Comments

For goodness sake...

Clearly, when performing their judicial functions in public, judges and magistrates should be professional and courteous at all times.

However, when in private, let human beings be human. We have all used black humour at some point in our lives. So if Mr Berry deserves to be punished for this nonsense, then so do we all.

Ffs

Let comedians joke about corporal punishment on children in the courts. Let dentists teachers and everybody else do it in private. If a magistrate does it who then makes decisions as to whether and how to punish a child with the force of the state, it’s OBVIOUSLY a problem

realist

Didn’t not the nine-c-clock news do this 40 years ago?

Cowboy

A digital watch ? “Yes that’s the one etc …..!” Or maybe the one that ends with Griff Rees – Jones saying “Well I can’t say I noticed sir when asked about the characteristics of the man he’d arrested for “walking in a funny way on the cracks of the pavement.”

Anonymous

Public sector employees and volunteers are not allowed to have a sense of humour.

Period.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Magistrate sanctioned for calling law grad colleague ‘trolley dolly’

Career changer backed by Judicial Conduct Office

Feb 19 2025 7:35am
6

Magistrate reprimanded over ‘sweet dreams’ remark during sentencing

Prompted angry response from defendant

Feb 12 2025 8:49am
9

Magistrate given warning for checking into court on Facebook

Also shared 'politically sensitive' posts

Dec 17 2024 8:17am
5