Departing Skadden associate urges boycott of trainee recruitment at firms silent on Trump attacks

Avatar photo

By Sophie Dillon on

17

Rachel Cohen’s message comes as her own firm strikes $100 million deal with US President

Rachel Cohen and her online ‘toolkit’

Departing Skadden associate Rachel Cohen has called on fellow BigLaw lawyers to withdraw from their firms’ recruitment efforts, in protest against what she describes as Donald Trump’s “escalating attacks” on the rule of law.

Cohen — currently serving her notice at Skadden after helping coordinate an open letter urging US law firm leaders to speak out against Trump — has published a detailed online “toolkit” encouraging junior lawyers at targeted firms to boycott student recruitment and interviewing unless their firms publicly oppose recent Executive Orders and sanctions.

The kit, shared under the banner “Trump v. Everybody”, call for big law associates to “withhold participation in all recruiting and interviewing until your firm stands for the rule of law”. The materials outline what Cohen describes as “intimidation tactics” aimed at silencing dissent within the legal profession, and accuse firms of capitulating rather than resisting.

Her post follows reports that Skadden has reached a pre-emptive $100 million pro bono agreement with the White House to avoid being targeted by a forthcoming Executive Order.

The 2025 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

The toolkit identifies 20 firms that have received letters from the EEOC requesting highly sensitive data on applicants and employees, including names, races, phone numbers, GPAs, and whether they were hired.

“These intimidation tactics send a clear message: any dissent against Trump invites punitive measure”, according to Cohen, highlighting a 22 March 2025 memo from the White House directing the DOJ to seek sanctions against lawyers engaged in so-called “vexatious litigation” against the government.

The soon-to-be ex-Skadden lawyer has framed the campaign not only as a legal resistance movement, but as a moral imperative for young lawyers. “If your employers cannot protect their employees and the rule of law, do not encourage students to work there,” she says.

The final sections of the toolkit encourage associates at targeted firms to withdraw from all hiring activities until leadership publicly rejects the EEOC demands. Cohen urges lawyers to demand clarity from partners and management about whether their firms intend to comply, and how they plan to protect their employees. She also calls for solidarity and internal organising, writing that “we have collective power — they just don’t want you to realise.”

17 Comments

JD-Dance

Fair play to her – brave move indeed

Donald Joffers

We don’t all have the privilege to be able to just quit for such things…

ReadingComprehension

Fortunately she has included ways she thinks you can help without quitting, so hopefully you can still contribute Donald Joffers!

Donald Joffers, competent in reading comprehension

And yet, that doesn’t really negate my point, does it? Having ‘options’ doesn’t change the fact that for many, quitting isn’t one of them. But thanks for the attempt, ReadingComprehension.

Stop being obtuse

Okay, and she did because she could. How is that a point against her? You can still praise the bravery despite the fact most cannot for their own reasons take that decision.

Donald Joffers, charmingly obtuse

And here we are. My comment said nothing against her decision—it was an observation. Yet you leapt at the chance to misread, misinterpret, and double down on a weirdly defensive response. Maybe work on *your* reading comprehension before taking offense at things that weren’t even criticisms?

Susanne Taylor

Good point. Which is why those who do, must.

Cynic

Don’t see how this will really affect big law tbh. These places do operate on the idea that if you don’t do the work someone else will happily continue the matters or the job without a second thought. All that matters is billables to US big law partners as that affects their bottom line.

Fair play to her for taking a stand, but don’t think this will do much in the grand scheme of things. Hope her career is fine after all this blows over.

A jam doughnut named Paul

Her career will be fine. A lot of firms will respect the bravery to do that and I wouldn’t be surprised if she had something lined up before posting.

This isn’t like a paralegal having a tantrum for being caught out

Flotsam & Jetsam LLP

She’d Skaddenuff of the firm Arpsing on about DEI

Cynic

You need to have quite the brass neck to represent vulture funds and megacorporations for years as they hollow out the middle classes of the West and exploit the working classes of the third world, and then to think that you’re somehow on the side of the angels.

NQ City Litigator

Once of the most sensible comments I’ve seen on here in a long time. If you do this job, just keep your mouth shut and don’t be a hypocrite.

Please read a book

There’s a huge difference between representing a bad client in court, and bribing a tyrant so he leaves your firm alone, while allowing him to create an environment that will make the courts completely ineffective in checking his power (because everyone is terrified of suing him), on the day he announced he wants to defy the constitution and run for a third term. These kinds of crass false equivalencies all in the name of the class struggle have started dictatorships and tragedies.

Cyclic

Vulture funds perform an important market function in moving risky assets off the books of primary banks and investment funds. I’m not sure how assisting the balance sheet of core financial service providers or protecting pension funds equates to “hollow[ing] out the middle classes”.

Call me a cynic, Cynic, but I don’t think you have much experience in high end capital markets work.

Ian

Sometimes money costs too much – Emerson

The Maple Leaf Forever 🇨🇦

Looks like it’s time for the EU and the Commonwealth to step into the limelight as torchbearers for freedom, democracy and the rule of law.

Hired Gun

Impressive that someone backs their convictions so much as to actually quit.

I am here for the paycheck, nothing more, nothing less.

“Are we the baddies?” Maybe, but doesn’t really matter when you care so little generally.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Trump hits yet another US law firm with executive order 

Jenner & Block becomes latest target

7 days ago

Executive order could have ‘destroyed’ firm, says Paul Weiss chair

Brad Karp defends deal with US president as Skadden junior lawyer resigns in protest over D&I attack

Mar 24 2025 10:43am
4