Inns of Court College of Advocacy students face ‘lottery’ over bar course progression amid record enrolments

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

13

Exclusive: Offers fee discounts and perks for those willing to defer


Bar students at the Inns of Court College of Advocacy (ICCA) face uncertainty over their course progression next month, as the college has announced it will need to defer some places due to an oversubscription of students.

Legal Cheek can reveal that the ICCA informed students yesterday that demand for enrolment in part two of its bar course remains “above our capacity”, meaning some aspiring barrister will need to delay their start dates, either voluntarily or involuntarily.

The ICCA course is divided into two elements, part one and part two. The first comprises the Bar Standards Board’s civil and criminal litigation exams, and is studied remotely with students setting their own pace and schedule, choosing when they wish to sit the exams. Once both exams have been passed, budding barristers commence part two, completing the remaining required assessments in a five month in-person block.

However, this flexibility also brings uncertainty. With a “record number of students” eligible and hoping to begin part two of the course in early March, the ICCA will defer some start dates until at least September.

Students who are deferred will receive a one-third reduction in their next set of fees, along with “tailored support from the ICCA”, according to an email sent to students. This support includes career meetings, marshalling opportunities, mini-pupillages, work experience, and mentoring by barristers in their preferred area of practice.

 The 2025 Legal Cheek Chambers Most List

It now falls to students to advocate their own cases for why they should be part of the March cohort. The bar course provider has asked students to provide “compelling reason(s)” as to why they should not be deferred. Options include: a pupillage commencing in September 2025, holding an Inns of Court scholarship, accommodation arrangements that have already been signed, and leaving employment to commence the course.

One frustrated bar student told Legal Cheek that the ICCA is effectively deferring some students “by force” and that the oversubscription will leave them “stranded” midway through their studies.

The email seeks to reassure students, stating that “every request for enrolment in this cohort will be carefully examined by a panel, on a case-by-case basis. The aim is to accommodate as many students as possible, while ensuring the “extremely high” teaching standards that are integral to the ICCA are maintained.”

Anyone who does not submit reasons, or who is not prioritised for a place by the panel, will be entered into a “lottery” to secure any remaining places. Students will find out whether they have been given a spot or not next Thursday, only two and half weeks before the course is due to begin.

In a further email sent this morning and seen by Legal Cheek, dean of the college, Lynda Gibbs KC, congratulated students on the “stellar set of results”, before adding that it never “wanted to be in a position of having to impede a student’s progression”.

“We have explored every avenue to extend the number of places on Part Two for March and we are acutely aware of the disappointment and anxiety that the recent communications have caused,” she said.

“Please be assured that we will do all we can to support you all as comprehensively as we can over the coming weeks and months,” Gibbs KC added.

The ICCA has been approached for comment.

Update: Thursday, 13 February at 2:28pm

In an email seen by Legal Cheek, the ICCA has confirmed that “all students who wish to start in March 2025 can do so”, and so no students have been involuntarily deferred. It is not known if or how many students voluntarily deferred their places in order to receive the perks offered above.

13 Comments

John

Please explain how this is anything other than an entirely preventable predictable planning oversight caused by enrolling too much students into Part 1?

Methuselah

Too much ?

English speakers used to say “too many”.

SeeYouAtTheBar

Record number of students competing for a record low number of pupilages. Beyond absurd

americandream

There is no good reason why a student who doesn’t have a pupillage offer commencing 2025 and/or an Inn of Court Scholarship should be on the bar course (and paying out of their pocket to do so!)

Wigmore

Here is a simply answer, and one which I have reached having both been involved in the chaos of an oversubscribed year (for which Bar course providers were fined) as well as having witnessed candidates coming though the system.

No one should be on the Bar course without pupillage secured. This does 2 things. (i) it ensures that the training received on the Bar course does not ‘lapse’ before the student starts using the knowledge, (ii) it reduces pressure on the system and stops people who will never receive pupillage from leaving Bar school loaded with debt.

Anonymous

There was a time when there was one supplier of the course, and the course admitted more people than pupillages but the data were clear on the prospects. Then the diversity crowd thought that was a bad idea. Now, every time they tinker and make things worse they knee-jerk to another worse plan.

How about forming a single Inns of Court School of Law, have 1,200 or so places a year, and require a minimum 2:1 for entry?

NotSure

Why 1200 when there are only just over 600 odd pillages?

Pilate

This isn’t the Viking Invasion, NotSure!

NotSure

This issue with this is that the (already prohibitive) cost of the Bar course has for some time now been subsidised by the presence of students whose intention is be Called to the Bar of England and Wales and then fly home to their own jurisdiction to practice. Whether or not it is desirable in principle for these students to be able to do so, in practice the only reason some aspiring (and ultimately successful) English and Welsh barristers are able to get a place on a Bar course – especially, say, for someone who needs to train outside of London – is because of the presence of foreign students. Linking Bar course places to pupillage offers would be great for the same old students with the private school background and family pals in the know, but would surely affect very talented and able individuals with perhaps less social capital.

Bored of this nonsense

Another day another self-pitying DEI whine.

C

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Excellent and substantive point, well made

SB

I think you are correct for other providers, but probably less so for ICCA. I would imagine they have far fewer overseas students than BPP or City.

C

Excellent and substantive point, well made

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Revealed: The Bar Courses with the highest pass rates

Bar Standards Board's latest data release well worth a look for aspiring barristers

Jul 22 2024 7:56am
9

Bar course students offered extra exam resits

Follows trial last year

Feb 5 2024 11:38am
4

Bar course grad wins The Apprentice 2023

Marnie Swindells secures Lord Sugar's £250,000 investment for boxing gym business

Mar 24 2023 11:28am
7