Business Secretary accused of falsely claiming he was a ‘solicitor’ — despite quitting training contract and never qualifying

Avatar photo

By Sophie Dillon on

13

Trained at Addleshaw Goddard before leaving to pursue a career in politics

Jonathan Reynolds MP
Jonathan Reynolds MP

The government’s Business Secretary is facing awkward questions after it emerged that he had apparently claimed to be a ‘solicitor’ despite not completing his training.

Jonathan Reynolds MP studied law at BPP Law School before securing a training contract at Addleshaw Goddard‘s Manchester office. However, 10 months into his two-year training contract, he is said to have decided against a legal career and instead pursued a path in politics.

While there’s nothing wrong with a change in careers, questions have been raised about why Reynolds has previously described himself as a “solicitor” in several places online, including on his LinkedIn profile.

The use of the term “solicitor” is strictly regulated under the Solicitors Act 1974. Only individuals who have been admitted as solicitors of the Senior Courts of England and Wales and whose names appear on the roll are allowed to use the title. A spokesperson for the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) confirmed Reynolds is not qualified as a solicitor.

The Business Secretary’s use of the term “solicitor” was first questioned by the political blog Guido Fawkes, which shared a screenshot purportedly showing Reynolds’ LinkedIn profile describing him as a “solicitor” at Addleshaw Goddard from May 2009 to May 2010. The reference appears to have been removed.

Reynolds did not respond to our request for comment, but his spokesperson told the blog that the reference was a mistake and that he has sought to make it clear he was a trainee solicitor before entering politics.

The revelations add to growing scrutiny over the accuracy of CVs among politicians. Chancellor Rachel Reeves recently faced criticism after edits were made to her online biography to clarify that her previous role at Halifax Bank of Scotland was in retail banking rather than as an economist.

13 Comments

Femanonanon

A lying Labour MP? What are the chances?!?!??!

Lost my TC but my nan doesn’t know

He just like me fr

Al

Funnily enough it wasn’t until 2010 that it became illegal to falsely claim you’re a barrister.

BoilerPlate

A mistake?

One does not go through the rigor of obtaining a training contract (particularly at AG) to then not know what it is to be a solicitor and whether one is a solicitor.

He lied about his solicitor status and now his press office are lying about his lying about it. Perhaps his press office will now issue a statement that it was a mistake that they said it was a mistake that he called himself a solicitor. Layer the lies up, why not?!

Curious to see whether the CPS or the SRA take any action.

Big boy

Calm down not that deep.

Mark

About as likely as Sunak breaking the law by holding a US green card whilst working in British politics.

Mr SRA

“Bogus solicitors
It is a criminal offence for someone to call themselves a solicitor or act as a solicitor if they are not on the roll of solicitors. This could be pretending to be a solicitor, for example, at court, but may also include describing themselves as a solicitor on their social media profiles. We call these people ‘bogus solicitors’ and we may prosecute them. We publish alerts about bogus solicitors and theft or cloning of a genuine solicitor’s identity.“

Johnny

When you claim to be a Solicitor on Linkedin to but you’re actually just a chill guy.

Jonny

Decisions decisions

Sir Kier Starmer has been placed in a difficult position as a result of this.

He gave Rachel Reeves a free pass for lying about her past professional experience and job roles held.

– If Starmer gives Reynolds a pass, Starmer will be accused of allowing his party to get away with criminal acts (which will absolutely be reported as two tier justice, and rightly so); but
– If Starmer doesn’t give Reynolds a similar pass, he’ll be accused of unequally applying the rules and/or two tier justice even within the confines of his own party.

Sir Kier is either going to hope something bigger happens that takes attention away from this, or he’s going to have to discipline Reynolds and construct a fairly complex argument that Reynolds was disciplined where Reeves wasn’t because this is a criminal matter whereas Reeve’s fibs were not.

Bad optics on the latter, however it’s spun, so my bet is this one will conveniently sink into the background unless the SRA or CPS bothers to take action (which they should, but I have no faith they will).

Andrew

Meh. Section 21 of the Solicitors Act 1974: “Any unqualified person who wilfully pretends to be, or takes or uses any name, title, addition or description implying that he is, qualified or recognised by law as qualified to act as a solicitor shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding the fourth level on the standard scale”. (Level 4 is up to £2,500, I think.)

Perhaps he was giving a misleading impression that he was qualified in 2010, but that is not quite the same as wilfully pretending to be one in 2025, or implying that he is still qualified to act as one.

Cynical about the SRA

I hope the irony that, if this was a current trainee at a firm, they would be getting dragged before the SDT and beaten over the head with a proverbial iron bar before the next 6 generations of their family were barred from the profession, isn’t lost on anyone reading this.

Hope the regulator has the stones to stick to its bullshit principles when it comes to enforcement against an MP rather than only picking fights against juniors who can’t afford good representation.

Celebrity Alert

OMG guyz Jen Shipley just posted another LinkedIn post about Suits!!! Oh wow get off LegalCheek and go read it straight away!!!

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Starmer selects new Lord Chancellor and Attorney General

Barristers Shabana Mahmood MP and Richard Hermer KC

Jul 8 2024 11:46am

Autumn budget: Further cuts to justice ‘untenable’, Law Society warns

The Chancery Lane body says MoJ needs essential funding to address courts backlog

Oct 29 2024 8:38am