SRA chair admits SQE ‘teething problems’

Avatar photo

By Lydia Fontes on

12

Regulator will keep responding to student feedback

Online exam
The chair of the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has acknowledged “teething problems” in the transition to the SQE, as part of a summary of discussions from the regulator’s latest board meeting.

Since its introduction in 2021, the SQE route to qualification has come under criticism as candidates have been forced to contend with clunky online booking systems, disruptive tech issues and marking blunders.

SRA boss Anna Bradley has acknowledged these issues, stating that “there have inevitably been some teething problems” with the new system and promising to continue responding to “feedback about the candidate experience”.

The SQE Hub: Your ultimate resource for all things SQE

The board highlighted the attainment gap between Black and Asian candidates and their white counterparts as a key area of focus. “This is not specifically an SQE issue,” Bradley explains, noting that similar disparities were observed in the LPC and other non-legal assessments. She adds that the SRA is “developing an action plan” to address this issue, based on the findings of the review it commissioned in 2023.

Despite these challenges, the board’s overall reflections on the SQE appear positive. Bradley writes, “The primary aim was to ensure that every solicitor was being assessed to the same high standard, and we are confident that this is the case.” The board also expressed confidence that the new qualification route will improve access to the profession, with Bradley stating: “There is also more opportunity to earn-as-you-learn, and a range of more affordable choices in the training market, which we hope will enable wider access to the profession.”

12 Comments

Matt

These people seem to live in a different world to everyone else. Exams shouldn’t be costing nearly £5000. They shouldn’t be taking nearly 6 weeks to mark. They shouldn’t be SBAQ.

mc

6 weeks for an exam that is marked automatically before you have even left the exam room as its computer generated (sqe1). and is over 3 months wait for seq 2.

Lost my CC TC

teething problems is an understatement

Dispassionate Observer

“There is also […] a range of more affordable choices in the training market, which we hope will enable wider access to the profession”.

But prospective candidates can’t accurately assess the quality of these training providers because the SRA has kicked the can down the road on publishing pass rates from each provider.

NOT GOOD!

TiredTirader54

I am confounded that the regulator is allowed to have “teething problems” including mishaps as big as incorrectly failing 175 students but the same grace is not extended to the students writing these exams who are expected to not only know 16 areas of law by rote but also apply the knowledge in time pressured conditions?

Not to mention the hilarity of stressing rote memorisation in the 21st century all dreamt up by a bunch of busy bodies who have never practiced law a single day in their life.

Anonymous

There must be doubt as to whether the SQE will teach fledgling Solicitors time and file management, so how to file by post or online – in and on time to avoid invalidation, instead of lazily binning or hiding a pile of mortgage & bill of sale applications, claims and other assorted forms – even to convey to a buyer aka purchaser the right, *single* housing estate property, rather than *two* in error, as has happened.

Sam

Are you drunk?

Anon

It’s ironic how I feel a complete sense of injustice being served to me as I study to join the field

DistressedAspiringLawyer

Jokers!

Fiona

I would love to see a Legal Cheek comparison article on how the SQE compares to various US bar exams, to better understand the format of the exam.

I did the GDL years ago, and am returning to law after time in academia. The SQE is a new ballgame, but I do see the merits of the exam – especially as it requires long-term retention and rapid applicability of legal issues in the way the old system didn’t.

Anyway, I think I am in the minority of people who like this exam… Controversial, I know

SQE hater

Neek

Archibald O'Pomposity

Do you realise that you’ve just said the demands of the examination should be watered down on the basis that the regulator has made administrative errors? If you’re not cut out for the law, just find a job as a qualified advisor in Holland and Barrett. Making the exams easier, and reducing or removing the need to draw upon information you have memorised, will only hurt the poor sods who rely on you to think on your feet when practising law.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Online exam
news SQE Hub

SRA seeks SQE feedback from students

Focus on functioning legal knowledge 🔎

Jan 17 2025 8:56am
15
Maab Saifeldin
news SQE Hub

Trainee solicitor bravely shares SQE struggles in viral post

‘Not everyone's path is smooth and easy,' says lawfluencer Maab Saifeldin after failing challenging exam

Dec 13 2024 11:29am