Law graduate rejected for a paralegal role vents frustration on LinkedIn

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

38

‘While I respect the firm’s selection process…’


A law graduate has expressed their disappointment on LinkedIn this week after being rejected from a role as an immigration paralegal at Irwin Mitchell. They told their LinkedIn connections, “I am surprised by the outcome and wonder if my application received due consideration.”

The unlucky graduate, whom Legal Cheek have decided not to name, began their post by explaining their relevant qualifications, namely “six months of relevant experience and proficiency in two additional languages, Persian and Turkish.” Unfortunately, this was not enough to land an interview for a paralegal role at large national outfit, Irwin Mitchell.

The poster questions whether the firm adequately considered their application for the role before turning them down. They also gesture to some doubts about the firm’s commitment to “the principles of diversity and equality”, suggesting that these principles “may not have been sufficiently considered during the evaluation process.”

The poster tagged the firm’s LinkedIn page, ending their post with a sarcastic “Special thanks to Irwin Mitchell!” and included a screenshot of an email from the firm informing them that their application won’t be taken any further and individual feedback would not be provided.



In an exclusive comment to Legal Cheek, the frustrated graduate said:

If a candidate with … six months of related experience applies for an immigration role and possesses multilingual abilities, they may still not be considered for an interview. This raises the critical question: what qualifications or elements must a CV include to warrant consideration?

If someone with minimal but relevant experience and strong language skills struggles to secure a role in a law firm … this creates a cycle where individuals are unable to break into new opportunities due to the lack of initial consideration.

They went on to discuss their concerns around diversity and inclusion:

The hiring process also raises questions about fairness. How does the firm approach applicants to ensure equality? Does diversity mean selecting candidates from various racial or cultural backgrounds, or does it involve offering everyone an equal opportunity to showcase their skills? True equality lies not in appearances but in ensuring a level playing field for all candidates.

38 Comments

You Don't Respect Anything.

This popped up on my LinkedIn the other day as ‘recommended’..

If I worked in HR and saw this post from a potential candidate, it would always be a rejection. Making such baseless claims against a potential employer is never a good look, and that last paragraph reads very much like “they didn’t positively discriminate, and that is not good”.

(218)(12)

Anonymous

Way to go, lobbing a grenade at your legal career!

Posting this on LinkedIn is going to take some serious work and time to repair your reputation.

Looks like IW dodged a bullet!

Bob Loblaw

Seems like they made the right choice.

I speak Persian and Turkish

1) You clearly don’t respect IM’s selection process, else why would you post this rant?
2) I’m guessing this is the first job you’ve been rejected for, so you’ve taken it personally. Do not take this personally, HR have a job to do. This is life.
3) Word of advice, don’t publish your angry rants about being rejected for job roles and tag the rejector company name, this kind of behaviour tends to come back to bite you and will not help your career.
4) Learn to be tenacious, applying for jobs is a full time job and don’t put your eggs in one basket.

You’re welcome.

anon

The post in itself is a reason why they were not hired… entitled.

I have faced many paralegal rejections, but I will still continue to apply, they are almost harder to get than at TC, I have had more VS interviews than paralegal.

I think firms are looking for candidates who have been paralegals in that specific field for a good amount of time, they probably cant be bothered to train paralegals and would rather a candidate who can start right away.

7 years PQE

Interesting that this person decided to turn off comments on their post following a range of helpful comments from people suggesting that such a post won’t do much to help future applications, rather than engaging with the feedback.

Law graduate turned paralegal turned barrister

The problem is not so much ‘lack of diversity’ – its the sheer numbers of law graduates looking for paralegal opportunities versus what may be considered law graduate worthy paralegal positions. Whoever landed the job may speak 3 languages and have 1 year’s relevant experience and not have an entitled attitude to being rejected?

Rohdou

There are lots of agencies out there. The problem a lot of employers are not looking for candidates who is gonna stay on just ti get post graduate experience and go on to be a Solicitor or Barrister. That’s a fact. I have seen this in the advert. We have to be honest when applying. We need the employer to write up our appraisal for SRA at the end of the two year training.

Entitled much?

I wonder of the entitled attitude came through in the application and was the reason for rejection…
My firm posted an advert for a paralegal role recently and got over 1000 applications in mere days, plenty of people with experience applied and had to be rejected as there is only so much time you can dedicate to a recruitment process for one role.
6 months experience is hardly something to shout about, there are plenty of career paralegals with more solid experience that would be prioritised. This person needs a reality check.

Muchly

This 👆

Commentator

Don’t take it personally, it’s just their commercial decision. I was rejected for the same role and firm you applied for and I’m a qualified solicitor!

Yuck

Absolutely REEKS of entitlement. The smell is putrid.

Zavilc

Not entitlement, just exasperation and frustration at the apparent unfairness.

NQ City Litigator

So bitter, and the post is incredibly damaging for his/her future career prospects. Dust that chip off your shoulder and get back to the applications (like we all had to do…)

Mr Recruiter

2 languages that anyone can chatgpt/deepl now and 6 months at a no-name 11 man high street office aren’t exactly the MVP credentials he thinks they are

Avocat Français

Chat GPT? For immigration law? I don’t agree with this chap on LinkedIn but that is profoundly silly to suggest for legal practice

Vaison la Romaine

Avocat e ?

Tout a fait raison !

John Smith

What an odd criticism to make of the selection process. “I wasn’t successful, therefore my ethnicity must in issue.” The PL acknowledges their lack of experience in their comment, but seems to fail to grasp that other candidates may have had more experience. Whether we like or not, prospective employers are taking a risk when they employ someone and it makes sense that mitigate that risk as far as possible by employing someone who is more likely to be capable of doing the job from the get go.

Anon

There are several variables the graduate might be overlooking. IW could have been well into the recruitment process by the time this candidate applied. Additionally, the candidate might have submitted a poorly written CV or been competing against someone with even more relevant experience. I feel that higher education often fails to provide graduates with practical career advice, leaving many of them feeling entitled to jobs that are, in reality, highly competitive.

Anon

Their personality shown from this post is Exhibit A. Grad rec will see this right through their application.

Good luck to the candidate getting further with any other applications with a post like this on their profile.

Dave

It just reminds me of that Hawk Tuah girl, but more serious and with a too high of an opinion of them self.

Roy

The supple hands of justice

Dean

I’d pay top US firm rates of over £1k per hour to have to her review my legal documents

Anon

I get their frustration, but wow, I always thought a rant like that would go on Reddit, not LinkedIn with your entire government name displayed. Yikes.

Entitled Grad

Definitely not the kind of person many would want to work with. Having seen their LinkedIn, there’s literally nothing that would distinguish their experience from the hundreds of others that probably applied

[Not] the Rejectee

But you don’t understand!!!

Irwin Mitchell are at fault here, not me!!!

They didn’t see my BRILLIANCE and they should have!!!

Furthermore, how dare they not give me a special pass because I speak two languages which should lead them to the conclusion that I must be BME!!!

Yikes

How to set fire to your legal career before it even begins.

Ibid

Yeah, perhaps not the best thing for your future legal career mate

Moron

LOL

Conwyn

Due to the number of candidates we are unable to provide individual feedback. So how was she rejected. Somebody or something must have said reject because she had the wrong star sign. In which case the individual feedback would be star sign.

Kennedy

In a very competitive situation like this, two things matter: what you possess; and how you communicate what you possess.

Your frustration dear colleague is understandable. But it’s likely there were applicants more qualified or who communicated their qualifications better in their CV than you did.
A bit of introspection and resilience will be more helpful to your career now.

Proof is not predicted on the figments of one’s imagination or phantoms. It is rather based on arguable facts.

Brian, age 10

There’s no coming back from that.

If nothing else, the utter ignorance to not realise this would nuke any chance of a legal career demonstrates this person was not cut out for law.

.

there are too many candidates for firms to choose from. simply put there were candidates with much more relevant experience. im confused as to why he posted this, rejection is normal (they need to get used to it, as everyone does, to be frank) and getting rejected from one firm doesn’t mean you’ll unsuitable for other firms. anyhow, bad idea to post this with the firm tagged on there.

Vaison la Romaine

I have 5 languages and I play the Piano,this latter surely qualifies me as
elite ‘Conveyensor’ at the Firm’s office in Tirana ?

Partner70

Entitled. I see it all the time. Graduates these days expect the world and don’t realise that there are thousands of similar people. And he don’t work particularly hard once in the role either.

Anonymous

The cultural clash when Gen Z hits the workforce en masse is going to be absolutely hilarious (and probably utterly catastrophic). Every generation has had its own quirks and idiosyncracies, but the levels of entitlement, self-importance and histrionicism shown by Gen Z – as displayed perfectly by this individual – are totally different to the culture and values of most professional workplaces.

Beer drinker

When Nigel gets some power with Elon’s cash we can at last ditch all this diversity nonsense once and for all.

3 YEAR PQE

I speak Persian and Turkish. Yes, very common and sought after languages in a London international law firm..

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Maab Saifeldin
news SQE Hub

Trainee solicitor bravely shares SQE struggles in viral post

‘Not everyone's path is smooth and easy,' says lawfluencer Maab Saifeldin after failing challenging exam

Dec 13 2024 11:29am
Irwin Mitchell's Jen Shipley

Law ‘SuperInfluencer’ Jen Shipley’s LinkedIn posts worth £300k, marketing guru claims

D&I advocate Justin Farance social media clout valued at nearly £200k

Nov 28 2024 8:53am
18