CMS launches fresh round of redundancies

Avatar photo

By Sophie Dillon on

11

15 lawyer roles in real estate practice


CMS is reportedly cutting up to 15 roles in its real estate transactions practice in London.

This marks the second round of redundancies at the global law firm in just over a year. In September 2023, CMS conducted a redundancy round in its UK corporate team, with up to 19 junior lawyers losing their roles as the firm responded to challenging market conditions.

A CMS spokesperson told Financial News:

“The UK real estate practice group is currently undergoing a review within our London office. We are in discussions with those affected and cannot comment further at this stage.”

The redundancy consultation comes despite the firm’s strong financial performance last year. CMS recorded a 7.2% rise in UK revenue for the 2023-24 financial year, reaching £734.7 million. However, global profit per equity partner (PEP) dipped 4% during the same period, falling from £771,000 to £741,559.

 The 2025 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

CMS raised its junior lawyer salaries in London last October, increasing newly qualified (NQ) pay from £105,000 to £110,000.  The Legal Cheek Firms Most List 2025 shows that the firm offers 95 training contracts across the UK annually, with first-year trainees earning £50,000 in London and £28,000-£43,000 in regional offices.

The redundancy consultation reflects wider trends in the legal sector, with firms continuing to adapt to fluctuating market demands. It follows cuts in 2023 to CMS’s corporate team and similar moves by other firms, including Reed Smith, which reduced its global workforce by 50 roles, and Orrick, which cut staff numbers by 6% the same year.

11 Comments

Anonymouse

“CMS recorded a 7.2% rise in UK revenue”

Wait, so why would they carry out redundancies given the inevitable reputational damage?

“However, global profit per equity partner (PEP) dipped 4%”

Ah.

Get R3AL

19 x £110,000 = £2,090,000 (+ other associated costs)

I doubt any firm would drop people for not breaking even, so I suspect these people weren’t busy at all. You then have to ask if it is worth running a team slightly lean. Yes I suppose it’ll slightly improve PEP but frankly if I knew a team had this much dead weight I don’t think I’d be feeling too sorry for them.

C L

They gotta pay for that new website somehow…

LW 3PQE

Good firm, see them opposite on us a number of deals. They’re well trained so they’ll land somewhere good.

CMS Nabarro LOLswang

15 roles, let’s be generous and say £150k salary with 6% pension contribution, £20k employer NI and some other benefits/bonus – total package £200k per lawyer.

x15 = £3m

Roughly 254 equity partners so let’s round down to 250, so total profit for distribution was around £185m for 23/24.

The average equity partner would have to see their earnings drop by £12,000, or 1.6%, and they could have zero redundancies. After tax, about £6k.

Or, about what they charge clients for a single day of their billable time.

Why would anyone want to work for a law firm that is seeking to trim headcount without the partners taking any sort of hit?

Anonymous

Maybe it’s more a business decision. Cut losses (real estate) and invest in a winning area = maximise returns and profits for partner.

Bit peak

I mean a bit silly of them to raise their NQ salaries twice in just a few years in hindsight .. tryna compete with the US big bros 🤣

Feel for those affected.

Why the RE lawyers affected?

Does anyone know why RE specifically from a macroeconomic perspective??

Not an RE lawyer

Real-estate is low-margins work even during a good economy – it’s largely not that complicated (limiting the value-add which you can mark your fees up to reflect), there are very strong pressures from clients to keep fees low, and there are dozens of firms who can do it, meaning there’s a lot of competition with very little differentiation.

When the economy dries up, property is one of the first investment classes to be affected – the lead-in costs for property development are stratospheric, with a long time before the asset becomes profitable, meaning that new buildings stop getting built and in-progress projects often get paused or cancelled. Couple that with lower interest from end-users in leasing / buying real estate during financially straightened times (would you move home if you’re getting a pay cut?), and then there’s less transactions in completed properties as well. Investors are also keen not to allocate capital to extremely illiquid asset classes like real estate, when there’s a risk of negative market movements.

The same thing happened during the GFC seventeen years ago – the property markets got absolutely eviscerated, and lots of RE and REF lawyers either lost their jobs or retrained as something else. That was even more acute given that the financial contagion there began in the real estate markets, and large swathes of the market took decades to recover. Here there’s no real property crash – but the economy is not hugely healthy, so the wider macroeconomic issues apply.

Thanks

Thank you “not an RE lawyer” this was very helpful.

Big Simon

I think what these comments about PEP are forgetting is that is the partners who bring in the work. If a few partners leave because PEP is falling, you’re going to have cut a lot more than 15 associates, believe me.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Man receiving cash bonus

CMS bumps London NQ lawyer pay to £110k

Rises in regions too

Oct 16 2024 8:31am
10

CMS to cut associate roles

Redundancies in corporate team

Sep 11 2023 9:15am
7

Listed legal business and majority shareholder clash in astonishing war of words

Firm accuses Ian Rosenblatt of 'offensive behaviour'; he fires back, calling the claims 'untrue and defamatory'

Jan 9 2025 1:57pm