Barristers employing ‘ethically questionable’ tactics, says regulator

Avatar photo

By Rhys Duncan on

17

Overzealous


The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has taken aim at bullying, inclusivity, and ethical issues as it looks for opinions on its next five-year strategy.

Barristers, the regulator says, can “sometimes allow their zeal to advance a client’s interests to embrace tactics which are ethically questionable”, amongst other problems.

Although the profession has many strengths including “the dedication of senior barristers to the development of the next generation” there remain a range of ethical and cultural issues.

In particular, chambers are “often informal in their governance” and “lack clear accountabilities”, something particularly harmful when pupils or junior barristers experience bullying and harassment “and need the protection of robust policies backed up by senior barristers.”

Whilst the regulator’s statement notes that “Some chambers are exemplary in their governance”, the BSB is looking to ensure that all chambers “can emulate the practice of the best”.

The Legal Cheek Chambers Most List 2025

The regulator is also concerned about the tendency of barristers to go beyond ethical boundaries in the pursuit of their clients’ cases. The Post Office scandal is cited as a situation in which a barrister’s often conflicting duties to the court and their clients can “come under pressure”. “We are keen to learn the lessons from the inquiry and explore how we can make these expectations clearer and ensure that our regulatory arrangements are fit for purpose in the future” it added.

Other questions were raised about the “ethical formation of junior barristers in circumstances where chambers are now sometimes more virtual than real”, the prevalence of bullying and harassment, and the need to “be more inclusive generally”.

Addressing these issues is part of the BSB’s plan to create “An excellent and ethical barrister profession which inspires public confidence and advances the interest of justice”, with the BSB “recognised as an excellent regulator trusted to advance the public interest”.

The comments come as the regulator has made a call for evidence to guide its next five-year strategy which will begin in April 2026.

17 Comments

Winble of Counsel

Oh come on!

It’s a barrister’s job to persuade.

Now that skill is being seen as bullying?

Snowflake barristers aren’t going to be good for anything, especially advancing the cause of justice!

Jacques Delarosiere

The profession is doomed anyway. 20 years and they shall be all gone…

Anonymous

We now have the justification so that the law society dont have to barr all those disgusting legal people who helped to unfairly prosecute post office managers they should be struck of and not excused for being eager to help their clients the po

Spudgun

Are you on drugs?

Idle barrister

Can the BSB first reflect on their treatment of junior barristers/pupils before preaching about bullying. The sad case of suspending a pupil for 18 months is still very much fresh in our minds!

Ian Dodd

Stap me vitals.
A superfluous regulator seeks to extend its life and relevance by inventing things to be pearl-clutchingly faux concerned about when barristers have pushed the boundaries for ever.
If your opponent doesn’t counter this stuff your next case is going to be easy

Anonymous

Couldn’t agree more, the call is coming from inside the house!

Apostrophe Watchdog

“it’s next five-year strategy”, “their clients cases” – poor little apostrophe is being misused and left out altogether!

Anonymous

What’s new ? What about barrister who dishonesty fabricate terms in order never discussed ? It’s very common and “standard practice”.

Bun

U ok, hun?

Ordinary Hardworking Brit

Pathetic. The sooner the UK follows the US in ditching woke and DEI the better.

Anonymous

How can anyone trust this system and when the ones who represent the law are often the perpetrators…
You pay for justice these days!
Ditch the barristers

Jimmy the Jock

Clients may pay for justice but should always be reminded what they will get is the law!

Danny

BSB, get your own house in order. Internal Tribunal delays by BSB drags the whole process out for alleged perpetrators and alleged victims/witnesses, leaving all parties aggrieved. Also, an independent Bar does need regulating but it is such a unique profession (all counsel are their own separate self employed business, coming together under the umbrella of a chambers), much more regulation and the fee increases that this would create would only the public, many of who would’ve been granted legal aid 15 or so years ago. Court system running like it’s own private empire, not caring about how they treat their users. Over regulation and GDPR will be the death of most industries. Just a tiny rant considering the areas that DO actually need addressing, sigh….

David

I left the bar in 2004 after 25 years because it was no longer the bar I joined and admired. Most of the great names whose example and behaviour in and out of court one observed and tried to replicate had gone. Replaced by a fair number of dishonest, over competitive, self obsessed narcissists overseen by an absurd, irrelevant and ignorant regulatory body. The profession will whither on the vine, and that’s probably a good thing.

John

Couldn’t agree more. The people commenting clearly haven’t been up against these self obsessed and way overly competitive barristers (and yes, maybe with a little hint of.. could be a little more honest). That’s probably who the BSB is talking about. It’s not a woke or DEI things. It’s that the most common type being hired to the bar these day is the ultra sharp and slick corporate gun for hire.

Big Bird

I detect some sock-puppeting going on here!

Join the conversation