105 make the grade in latest KC appointments

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

4

326 applied

Barrister's wig and gown on table
There will be 105 lawyers taking silk this year, up from the 95 who became KCs in 2024.

The latest competition attracted 326 applications, with 32% getting the nod for an appointment.

The new cohort consists of 72 men, with a success rate of 30%, and 33 women, with an acceptance rate of 39%. Among them, 18 individuals identified as being from an ethnic background other than white, representing 30% of non-white applicants. Additionally, eight new KCs have a disability, accounting for 42% of disabled applicants.

There was just one solicitor appointed this year from the five who applied, co-head of the India Group at A&O Shearman Sheila Ahuja.

The Legal Cheek Chambers Most List 2025

The process of appointing new silks is overseen by the KC Appointments body which assesses aspiring silks on a range of criteria including: advocacy work, cases of substance and complexity, understanding and using the law, and working with others.

Monisha Shah, chair of the selection panel, said:

“I would like to offer my congratulations to all the new silks announced today. The selection process is a rigorous and demanding one and I believe that every one of these new silks will be a credit to their profession.”

4 Comments

Well

So 39% of women were successful but only 30% of men were successful.

Is anyone going to talk about this gender gap?

Anyone?

Anyone?

For goodness' sake

More than double the number of men were appointed compared to women. Your point is idiotic.

Anon junior barrister

(one of) the explanations put forward for this is that men are more willing to apply when their prospects of success are lower. The theory is that whereas women tend to wait until they have all their ducks in a row for the application, men are more willing to apply earlier in their careers before they have their 12 cases of significance/ complexity to rely on.

So I don’t think the disparity in success (necessarily) supports any implied point about women having it better at the Bar

He / Him / His

Gender gap?
Still more than twice as many men as women were appointed…
Yet, proportionally, women made more successful applications than men did.
What exactly are you implying?

Join the conversation