Staff told to work from home and student pulled from placement over partner’s ‘appalling conduct’

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

9

Struck off

Mental health
A partner has been struck off after a disciplinary tribunal heard that staff were instructed to work from home due to his “appalling conduct”, which created an “unsafe and toxic” office environment.

Domenico (Dominic) Pisano’s behaviour was so troubling that a university even withdrew a student from their work placement at the firm, which was part of their degree programme.

The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) found nine proven instances of “offensive, intimidating, and demeaning” behaviour by Pisano, formerly co-director of the London firm Dominic Levent Solicitors, between September 2021 and April 2022.

In one example, Pisano moved his face “inappropriately close” to a female trainee’s face and shouted at her during a virtual meeting with a client of the firm.

On another occasion the partner referred to a former employee as a “gaylord” and “battyman”, before later showing a paralegal an image of a woman’s vagina on his phone. He also told the same woman, “I can’t look at you, you look sexy,” before covering his eyes.

In a further incident noted by the tribunal, Pisano began kneeing the chair of a work-experience student before kicking a bag containing empty bottles and a lunch box, and in doing so, “used such force that his foot connected” with the student’s ankle.

 The 2025 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

The SDT’s judgment summarises what happened next:

“The Respondent [Pisano] later apologised to [the student]. However, [the student] questioned the sincerity of this apology. They later went for a walk where they discussed several things including the Respondent’s future plans for the Firm and how [the student] fitted into those. [The student] described this as the Respondent’s attempt at ‘power play’ to remind him that he was powerful. After they had returned to the office, a suit that the Respondent had purchased for [the student] arrived at the office. After this the Respondent said something to the effect of ‘obviously this suit is not blackmail as it was ordered before.’”

The partner was also found to have made inappropriate comments to a trainee regarding their religious beliefs, telling them in front of the office that they should “obey and listen to him” and “follow the teachings of the Quran”.

Another witness told the tribunal that he would use vulgar terms such as “being raped” or “fucked in the ass” when discussing a difficult case he was working on.

The tribunal also noted that Pisano’s conduct made the office environment so “unsafe and toxic” that the firm’s co-director had to ask the employees to work from home.

In striking off Pisano, the tribunal said “it should have been obvious to all solicitors, particularly an experienced solicitor in a position of a seniority and authority, that a solicitor that shouts at colleagues, uses unsuitable, insulting and/or homophobic language whilst in the office, shows colleagues pornographic pictures, physically assaults (whether recklessly or intentionally) a member of staff in the office and/or bullies, harasses and demeans colleagues whilst in the office, does not act with integrity”.

Whilst Pisano initially engaged with the regulator in its investigation and attended the first case management hearing, he took no part in the remaining tribunal action and was not present or represented at the hearing.

Along with being struck off, Pisano was ordered to pay just shy of £42,000 in costs.

9 Comments

MC Lawyer

We should be questioning how things like this are allowed to go on for so long. It goes all the way up the chain to Magic Circle and US firms, even if the levels of extremity vary. Sometimes the behaviour isn’t even as covert, but people pick up on something not being quite right, yet still don’t step in to change anything. The legal profession is not a beacon for justice, nor is it an example of the best moral conduct, so I am not quite sure what it exists for.

Anonymous

“…does not act with integrity.” – perhaps the lightest terms in which the tribunal could have described this man’s depraved behaviour. The fine is also a joke for a Partner, particularly one that failed to take part in the entirety of the tribunal action and was not present at the hearing.

Curious Bystander

Can you imagine the penalty if this behaviour was from a paralegal or trainee?

This is not a proportionate response by any measure.

Anon

“it should have been obvious to all solicitors” – obvious yet we still look the other way. Things need to change.

Anonymous

There needs to be better protection and reporting system for whistle-blower and those should raise concerns.

It’s not just law firms, Look what happened to those who raised concerns about Lucy Letby and Horizon.

Anon

Agreed, but there is a culture of people looking away and avoiding rocking the boat. When people do this, they will find any excuse to avoid confronting the truth. When you work in an environment where people won’t support you, believe you, or gaslight you, it’s incredibly difficult to challenge the status quo, even with stronger protections and reporting systems. The underlying culture is what needs to change.

Detective

One dislike on all the sensible comments above. Domenico Pisano is that you?

Let’s be truthful here

This is standard behaviour at City law firms. People pretend to be shocked and appalled but I’d say at least 50 percent of partners in the City – regardless of gender – act in some way that could be called bullying at the best and racisms/sexism / harassment at the worst. Of the other 50 percent at least half of those are complicit in that they do or say nothing about it even though they know it’s going on and of the remaining 25 percent probably 15 percent are decent people.

Sue

I had a partner shout into my face from an inch away, back when I’d started a HR role in a city firm. I didn’t feel I could do anything about it, and of course nobody on the floor stepped in. And what was my heinous crime? Circulating an email on helping employees to stop smoking …. we had a big tobacco client. He shouted into my face ‘who said smoking is bad for your health?’ NB this was the 90s, not the 50s.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Hour glass and calendar

Judge given formal advice over 17-month judgment delay

Cited additional judicial responsibilities as a contributing factor to the delay

Oct 23 2024 10:21am
2