SRA still unable to confirm timeline for revealing SQE provider pass rates

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

8

Crucial comparison data was due by the end of 2023

calendar
Nearly a year after committing to publish SQE pass rates by provider, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has told Legal Cheek that it still cannot confirm when this information will be released.

The regulator previously committed to publishing candidate performance data, including pass rates by training provider, from “late 2023”.

The aim of publishing these statistics is to help aspiring solicitors make more informed choices when selecting a preparation provider, a need that has become even more pressing with the recent drop in SQE1 pass rates to a record low of 44%.

However, in December of last year, we revealed that the SRA would not meet this self-imposed deadline, citing a lack of “sufficient data”.

The SQE Hub: Your ultimate resource for all things SQE

Fast forward nearly a year, and the SRA has told us it remains committed to publishing the data but can’t specify when this will happen.

A spokesperson for the SRA said:

“We are analysing the data we currently have and intend to publish that in a report soon. We also remain committed to publishing data linking SQE candidate outcomes with how they prepared for their assessments. We are working with a third party to explore how we can develop an interactive tool to enable the data to be searched in a way that will be helpful for candidates.”

The ongoing delay is likely to frustrate both law schools and aspiring solicitors, especially since publishing this data was one of the regulator’s key selling points in transitioning away from the Legal Practice Course.

Several law schools have already started sharing breakdowns of their pass rates, though these figures depend on students voluntarily reporting their results to the institution. Meanwhile, other providers have opted not to disclose their candidates’ success rates.

8 Comments

SQE Student

I studied with one of the large providers (which I’ll leave unnamed to avoid removal of this comment). Over half of my class failed SQE1, and while I was fortunate enough to pass, the results for SQE2 were equally concerning — about half of my class also failed that exam, including myself. This brings the overall pass rate for first-time candidates in my class down to around 30%. It’s disheartening to see such low success rates, especially when these providers are supposed to prepare us for the assessments. The lack of transparency around pass rates adds to the uncertainty for aspiring solicitors.

Single click

Imagine how you might have performed without using a provider.

The provider has probably improved your performance and that of your group more than if you had not done whatever course. But it would be helpful to see the numbers.

bee pee peeved

On the one hand I’m not expecting high pass rates from providers who are often just as in the dark as the candidates to be honest

On the other , if you’re an educational institution with private equity backing and contracts with leading firms – you shouldn’t have family law specialists teaching Business Law and Practice or staff availability issues in the mock assessment periods

Wait till you practice..

Wait till you get into private practice and you’re a trainee in corporate asked by the partner to deliver a training session to clients on commercial contracts or a junior lawyer in banking told to cover an update to clients on property litigation.. you’re in the comfortable position of being trained by someone else now.

Wait till the tables are turned. And when those clients start mumbling about your background, and how your training session sucks, and how the original presenter should have been available because it’s the client’s busy season, and how your city firm makes millions from them but can’t even find the right type of lawyer.. just take a moment.

Anon

A bit of a dull comparison really. You mention being a trainee – your supervisor won’t be from a different department…

Just double click

Why don’t they just publish the data they have in a simple table.

No time wasting fancy graphics.

No misleading explanations.

No OTT interactive tools to “help” users understand.

Just put in the numbers. It’s not rocket science.

Key data first. Then you can spend the next 4 years wasting money making it look fancy. Probably with some overly expensive AI paid for by solicitors fees.

self reporting

SRA might not have published but providers are making claims about their own numbers. Google it.

UoL say 78% passed the SQE1 in January 2024.
BPP say 79% passed the SQE1 in January 2024.
National pass rate was supposedly 59%.

Barbri – could not find data on January 2024 sitting but they say 60% passed SQE1 in July 2024 where the national pass rate was 44% as reported here.

Looks like the provider students are doing better than the average maybe?

Questioning

I think your conclusion is likely to be right but I still wonder whether those numbers may be inflated since they’re self-reported, first by students to their providers, and then by providers to be published. There’s too many ways for a few fails to “drop out” of the picture for me to be certain these are true.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Man cutting into pie
news SQE Hub

Who is claiming the biggest slice of the SQE prep market pie?

As a major law firm overhauls its SQE partnership, Legal Cheek assesses the battle for law school dominance

5 days ago
6
Student sitting SQE
news SQE Hub

SQE1 pass rate drops to just 44%

Lowest success rate so far

Oct 2 2024 10:58am
53
Reed Smith London
news SQE Hub

Reed Smith goes all in with College of Legal Practice for the SQE

Barbri loses out as firm relaunches training programme

Oct 8 2024 10:59am