Magistrate warned after ‘heated dispute’ over neighbour’s dog

Avatar photo

By Thomas Connelly on

4

Emphasised legal knowledge

dog
A magistrate has received a formal warning from the judicial watchdog following a “heated dispute” with a neighbour regarding their dog.

Jean Banford JP is reported to have repeatedly emphasised her knowledge of the law, citing her position on the bench, when arguing that the dog could be destroyed.

The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) said that Banford acknowledged her comment could, in hindsight, be considered inappropriate. However, she explained that the neighbour’s refusal to recognise that the dog was causing fear and could be destroyed prompted her to emphasise her legal knowledge.

 The 2025 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

A subsequent investigation found that the magistrate had used her judicial status in a bid to “exert pressure and lend weight” to her arguments which is a “clear breach” of the expected standards of conduct.

“The nominated committee member took into consideration that Mrs Banford was a long serving magistrate of good character, who willingly shared footage of the interaction and accepted that her comments were inappropriate,” the decision states. “Mr Justice Keehan and the Lord Chancellor agreed with the findings and issued Mrs Banford with a formal warning.”

4 Comments

Mr. Bucket Esq.

I can just picture they type…

AsKing

So using legal knowledge is in itself wrong now? Or did she say she was a magistrate while arguing? This report is unclear and there is big difference.

Al

Telling someone you’re a magistrate is surely disavowing that you know anything about the law?

Anonymous

This is ridiculous! Knowing the law and saying you know it is now wrong! Being a Magistrate does not require you to know the law…. so why saying you are one has implications? Qualified lawyers once removed from the Roll cant call themselves lawyers… but former/retired, even if you are 25 years old!

Join the conversation