Freshfields wants at least 20% of its future trainees to come from lower socio-economic backgrounds 

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

10

Magic Circle player sets new target

diversity
Magic Circle law firm Freshfields is now one of only a handful of City outfits to publicly establish a diversity target for its future trainee intakes.

The outfit today confirmed that it will aim to recruit at least 20% of trainees from “lower socio-economic backgrounds” across the 2024-2026 recruitment cycles.

The Legal Cheek Firms Most List 2025 shows Freshfields is one of the largest trainee recruiters in the City with an annual training contract offering of around 80.

NEW: The 2025 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

London managing partner Mark Sansom said:

“I am proud of our commitment to continually advance our social mobility priorities, ensuring that everyone at the firm now or in the future has access to the opportunities and support necessary to excel. Setting a social mobility-focused recruitment target is an essential step in expanding access to the legal profession and strengthens the sense of belonging among our future trainees and current employees.”

A number of City firms have upped their efforts in recent years to improve diversity across their junior ranks. Firms such as A&O Shearman, Ashurst, Linklaters, and Simmons & Simmons have implemented targets for recruiting ethnic minority and Black trainees, while others, including the London office of Ropes & Gray, have developed work experience programmes aimed at aspiring lawyers from lower socioeconomic backgrounds.

Last summer Legal Cheek reported that Slaughter and May was looking to increase the proportion of its lawyers from lower-social economic backgrounds to 15% by 2033.

10 Comments

Peterpiper

How about allocating places by merit? The talented get top marks wherever they grew up.

Future Trainee at a US Firm from a Council Estate

Touch grass you pretentious neek

Jonas

No idea what those words mean, mate

Pretentious neek

Vocabulary of someone who’s been given an easier AC

George

Knowing many lawyers from privileged backgrounds, they are not as smart as made out to be. Aside from comparing like with like regarding marks, law firms and other professions recruit people based on factors other than their marks, hence directly discriminating against those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds in favour of nice-but-dim Tims and Tamaras.

Incompetence abounds amongst the self-righteous privileged.

Selection based on merit is your biggest fear.

Pretentious neek

Actually what you’re suggesting falls squarely outside of the definition of “directly discriminating” — you’re thinking of indirect discrimination. And in any case please show me how screening for emotional intelligence and communication skills would filter out poor people (without saying anything classist) this is gonna be hilarious.

George

Emotional intelligence = Attending the right oxbridge college? Having the right accent? Being able to chat about the lack of snow in Val-d’Isere? Wearing expensive suit? Being a priveleged dick?

One is right and your simple-minded response proves my point. Go cry to nanna/matron/wet nurse, or whoever.

Was that hilarious Tim? I can hear your guffawing like a donkey. You need to take a step up in class yourself, just to be considered third rate.

Wilson Palmer

But perhaps they may be able to spell, which is an area you might like to consider working on

Anon

Frankly put, 3-4 A* A-levels obtained at Eton is less impressive than the same grades obtained at a college in Newham rated ‘poor’, and the second person is more likely to be a potential star performer. It’s those sorts of instances firms are looking at during selection processes – people who succeed when the odds are totally stacked against them > spoon fed individuals. They’re not choosing people with sh*t grades etc., obviously.

George

I see the privileged get their servants to type their comments ensuring proppa spellin and not just eyeoning there Daley Telegraf.

Pardon me guvnor!

Now think about your contribution to society, which is clearly less than your contribution to the debate. Desperate. Is that one rite?

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Osborne Clarke to mentor disadvantaged school kids in social mobility push

Lawyers will provide CV and interview support as well as offer career insights as part of new partnership with three secondary schools

Oct 7 2021 9:20am

Freshfields targets social mobility ‘cold spots’ with sixth form mentoring scheme

Teens eligible for paid internships at magic circle firm

Feb 11 2021 10:55am

Bakers targets A Level students with social mobility support programme  

Skills sessions, networking, mentorship and more

Nov 14 2023 6:19am
1